Internet-Draft SDF modeling for digital twin February 2025
Lee, et al. Expires 29 August 2025 [Page]
Workgroup:
ASDF Working Group
Internet-Draft:
draft-lee-asdf-digital-twin-06
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Authors:
H. Lee, Ed.
ETRI
J. Hong
ETRI
J-S. Youn
Dong-eui Univ
Y-G. Hong
Daejeon University

Semantic Definition Format (SDF) modeling for Digital Twin

Abstract

This memo specifies SDF modeling for a digital twin, i.e. a digital twin system, and its interactions. An SDF is a format to describe Things and their associated interactions, and to represent the various kinds of information that is exchanged for these interactions. Therefore, the SDF format can be used to define the behavior of things, i.e. physical objects, and related data and interaction models in a digital twin that contain objects as components.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 29 August 2025.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

A digital twin is defined as a digital representation of an object of interest and may require different capabilities, for example, synchronization and real-time support, according to the specific domain of application. [Y.4600]. Digital twin help organizations improve important functional objectives, including real-time control, off-line analytics, and predictive maintenance, by modeling and simulating objects in the real world. Therefore, it is important for a digital twin to represent as much real-world information about the object as possible when digitally representing the object.

Nowadays, digital twin technologies are applied in various domains including manufacturing, energy, medical, farm, transportation, etc. And a common format is needed to represent the objects in the domains as digital twins. SDF [I-D.ietf-asdf-sdf] can be used for modeling objects as digital twins.

This document specifies the modeling and guidance on how to use SDF to represent objects as digital twins.

2. Terminology

This specification uses the terminology specified in [I-D.ietf-asdf-sdf] in particular "Class Name Keyword", "Object", and "Affordance".

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

3. SDF structure for digital twin

This section describes SDF structure with the new Class Name Keyword, sdfNonAffordance, to represent a thing or an object as a digital twin.

3.1. New Element for digital twin

The SDF language uses six Class Name Keywords, and sdfNonAffordance is added as a new Class Name Keyword for digital twin.

The information attributes for digital twin are defined in [ISO23247-3]. Some of them, for example characteristics and status, can be described using existing Class Name Keywords. And the others, for example location, can be described using sdfNonAffordance.

                {
                  "info": {
                    "title": "An example of the heater #1 in the boat #007",
                    "version": "2025-01-27",
                    "copyright": "Copyright 2025. All rights reserved.",
                  },
                  "namespace": {
                    "heater1": "https://example.com/heater1"
                  },
                  "defaultNamespace": "heater1",
                  "sdfObject": {
                    "boat": {
                      "sdfProperty": {
                          "value": {
                              "description":
                                "The state of the heater #1 in a the boat #007; false for off and true for on.",
                              "type": "boolean"
                          }
                        },
                        "sdfNonAffordance": {
                            location:{
                                "wgs84": {
                                  "latitude": "35.2988233791372",
                                  "longitude": "129.25478376484913",
                                  "altitude": "0.0"
                                },
                                "postal": {
                                  "city": "Ulsan",
                                  "post-code": "44110",
                                  "country": "South Korea"
                                },
                                "w3w": {
                                  "what3words":"toggle.mopped.garages"
                                }
                            }
                            report: {
                              "value": {
                                  "description":
                                    "On February 24, 2025, the boat #007's heater #1 was on from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m.",
                                  "type": "string"
                              }
                            }
                        }
                    }
                  }
                }
Figure 1: An example of SDF for digital twin

3.2. Architecture of Digital Twin

The architecture of a digital twin based on the SDF model is illustrated in Figure 2, , following the guidelines of [ISO23247-3].

The Physical Layer comprises affordance and non-affordance objects. From the real-world objects, only those deemed relevant are selected for representation as digital twins. The Digital Twin Layer is structured into three sublayers: the Device Communication Sublayer, the Digital Twin Sublayer, and the Application Sublayer. The Device Communication Sublayer is responsible for monitoring and collecting data from both affordance and non-affordance objects. This sublayer provides the necessary data to synchronize the physical objects with their digital twin counterparts. The Digital Twin Sublayer ensures synchronization between the affordance and non-affordance objects and their respective digital twins using the data provided by the Device Communication Sublayer. The Application Sublayer presents the synchronized values of the digital twins to users, facilitating informed decision-making.

        +---------------------------------------------+ - - - - - - - - - - -
        |            Application Sublayer             |
        | +----------+ +------+ +--------+ +--------+ |
        | |  Human   | | HMI  | |  Apps  | |  Peers | |
        | +----------+ +------+ +--------+ +--------+ |
        +---------------------------------------------+
        |           Digital Twin Sublayer             |
        | +----------+ +-------------+ +------------+ |
        | | Operation| | Application | | Resource   | |
        | |    and   | |     and     | | access and | |
        | |management| |   service   | |interchange | |
        | +----------+ +-------------+ +------------+ |
        | +-----------------------------------------+ |  Digital twin Layer
        | |     Digital representation of objects   | |
        | |   +-------------+   +----------------+  | |
        | |   |  Affordance |   | Non-Affordance |  | |
        | |   |   objects   |   |    objects     |  | |
        | |   +-------------+   +----------------+  | |
        | +-----------------------------------------+ |
        +---------------------------------------------+
        |        Device Communication Sublayer        |
        |     +-------------+   +----------------+    |
        |     |    Data     |   |     Object     |    |
        |     | collection  |   |     control    |    |
        |     +-------------+   +----------------+    |
        +---------------------------------------------+ - - - - - - - - - - -
        |     +-------------+   +----------------+    |
        |     |  Affordance |   | Non-Affordance |    |
        |     |   objects   |   |    objects     |    |     Physical Layer
        |     +-------------+   +----------------+    |
        +---------------------------------------------+ - - - - - - - - - - -
Figure 2: Basic Architecture of digital twin

4. Requirements for digital twin

4.1. Overview

A digital twin is a partial representation of sdfThing or sdfObject that contains attributes such as sdfProperty, sdfAction and sdfEvent[ISO23247-1]. By representing sdfThing as a digital twin, crucial events that require appropriate action can be quickly detected and controlled. The requirements defined in [ISO23247-1] are applied to represent sdfThings and sdfObjects as digital twins.

4.2. Data acquisition

Data related to sdfThing and sdfObject, such as sdfProperty, sdfEvent, and sdfAction, should be collected from IP and non-IP devices.

4.3. Data analysis

The collected data needs to be analyzed to understand the state of sdfThing and sdfObject.

4.4. Identification

The sdfThings and sdfObjects should contain data that uniquely identifies them as digital twins.

4.5. Accuracy

The sdfThings and sdfObjects should be represented as digital twins with appropriate levels of detail and accuracy, depending on the application.

4.6. Synchronization

The sdfThings and sdfObjects should be synchronized with their digital twins in real-time as appropriate for the application. Newly added or removed sdfThings and sdfObjects should be recognized and reflected in the digital twin.

5. Procedures for digital twin

A procedure for representing sdfThing, as a digital twin in a domain is as follows:

6. Security Considerations

Only authorized users should have the authority to manage sdfThings and sdfObjects.

7. IANA Considerations

This document has no IANA actions.

8. References

8.1. Normative References

[I-D.ietf-asdf-sdf]
Koster, M., Bormann, C., and A. Keränen, "Semantic Definition Format (SDF) for Data and Interactions of Things", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-21, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-21>.
[I-D.ietf-laari-asdf-relations]
Laari, P., "Extended relation information for Semantic Definition Format (SDF)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, I-D.ietf-laari-asdf-relations-04, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/I-D.ietf-laari-asdf-relations-04>.
[ISO23247-1]
"Automation systems and integration Digital twin framework for manufacturing - Part 1: Overview and general principles, ISO 23247-1.", , <https://www.iso.org/standard/75066.html>.
[ISO23247-3]
"Automation systems and integration Digital twin framework for manufacturing - Part 3: Digital representation of manufacturing elements, ISO 23247-3.", , <https://www.iso.org/standard/78744.html>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
[Y.4600]
Union, I. T., ""Recommendation ITU-T Y.4600 (2022), Requirements and capabilities of a digital twin system for smart cities.", .

8.2. Informative References

[saref4bldg]
Poveda-Villaln, M. and R. Garcia-Castro, "SAREF extension for building", , <https://saref.etsi.org/saref4bldg>.

Authors' Addresses

Hyunjeong Lee (editor)
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
218 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu
Daejeon
34129
South Korea
Jungha Hong
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
218 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu
Daejeon
34129
South Korea
Joo-Sang Youn
DONG-EUI University
176 Eomgwangno Busan_jin_gu
Busan
47340
South Korea
Yong-Geun Hong
Daejeon University
62 Daehak-ro, Dong-gu
Daejeon
34520
South Korea