[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: QC draft

To: Guylhem Aznar <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: QC draft
From: "Mr. Poet" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 22:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: LDP discuss <[email protected]>, [email protected], recipient list not shown: ;
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-date: 10 Sep 1999 05:30:50 -0000
Resent-from: [email protected]
Resent-message-id: <WaiDx.A.JBC.KeJ23@murphy>
Resent-sender: [email protected]

In regards...


As long as QC does not bleed into the license territory.
QC Mark - I don't really agree with this one, we are putting a branding on
a document that is voluntarily published and or reviewed.

Just thoughts
Poet

<COMMANDPROMPT> Development in Real Time
	<PROJECT> LinuxPorts    - http://www.linuxports.com     </PROJECT>
	<PROJECT> LDP 		- http://www.linuxdoc.org       </PROJECT>
	<PROJECT> LDP 	- Howto Co-Coordinator   		</PROJECT>
<AUTHOR>Consultants - VAR - Commercial - Networking - WWW/Intranet</AUTHOR>
</COMMANDPROMPT>


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

References:
- QC draft
  - From: Guylhem Aznar <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: QC draft
Next by Date: Re: QC draft
Previous by thread: QC draft
Next by thread: Re: QC draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread