[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Licensing issues

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Licensing issues
From: Donnie Barnes <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 17:12:34 -0400
Cc: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]> from [email protected] on Tue, 21 Sep 1999 07:08:26 +1000.
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-date: 20 Sep 1999 21:12:49 -0000
Resent-from: [email protected]
Resent-message-id: <LveCbB.A.vTF.QNq53@murphy>
Resent-sender: [email protected]


> > I don't care to go into the debate on why we need to avoid this *again*.
> > Suffice it to say that documentation IS NOT software.  Leave people the
> > ability to choose and let the LDP have the most useful documentation it
> > can reasonably have.
> 
> Unmodifiable documents are uneditable/untransformable/untypesettable
> documents. Documents must be modifiable if they are to published in any
> form other than that which the author produces.

Sorry, I should have been more specific.  I'm talking about content
modification, period.


--Donnie

--
  Donnie Barnes  http://www.donniebarnes.com  [email protected]  "Bah."
   Challenge Diversity.  Ignore People.  Live Life.  Use Linux.  879. V. 
    Bats, when dipped in batter and deep fried, still taste pretty bad.



--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Licensing issues
  - From: Terry Dawson <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Licensing issues
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: Licensing issues
Next by Date: Re: [off topic] Re: Licensing issues
Previous by thread: Re: Licensing issues
Next by thread: Re: Licensing issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread