[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: HOWTO vs. mini-HOWTO??

To: Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: HOWTO vs. mini-HOWTO??
From: Guylhem Aznar <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 00:43:50 +0200
Cc: Linux Documentation Project <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-date: 9 Oct 1999 13:29:14 -0000
Resent-from: [email protected]
Resent-message-id: <HPbMV.A.ma.qM0_3@murphy>
Resent-sender: [email protected]

On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 06:48:33PM +0200, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
> Is there any good reasons for maintaining the two HOWTO categories? Just a
> thought.

IHMO there's no good reason; mini HOWTOs are just a bit more specific.

But their authors deserve (and hopefully get!) the same consideration,
their documents being just as important as "plain" HOWTOs.

Hilsen,
Guylhem

PS: Hvordan er vejret i �rhus?

-- 
Guylhem Aznar, Linux Documentation Project: http://www.linuxdoc.org
PGP key: http://oeil.qc.ca/~guylhem ; Email: guylhem \@/ oeil.qc.ca
"They who can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin 


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

References:
- Re: FTP Access for Authors
  - From: Niels Kristian Bech Jensen <[email protected]>
- HOWTO vs. mini-HOWTO??
  - From: Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Draft Bolierplate License
Next by Date: Re: Draft Boilerplate License
Previous by thread: HOWTO vs. mini-HOWTO??
Next by thread: Re: FTP Access for Authors
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread