[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: free vs. non-free debate
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Guylhem Aznar wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 09:40:21AM +0100, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> > Please note that I'm not against helping people in their problems,
> > independently of the freeness of the relevant packages. It's the LDP,
> > as an organization, that should not promote non-free software by
> > endorsing the documenting task.
>
> We will refuse documentation covering non-free software.
>
> Free software need free documentation, we don't mind non-free software.
Just curious.
What happens if someone is offered the ability to get paid for writing
free documentation for non-free software? Will you refuse it? Even if this
means turning down a good document?
Hugo.
--
Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ Maasland
[email protected] http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~hvdkooij/
--------------------------------------------------------------
Use of any of my email addresses for unsollicited (commercial)
email is a clear intrusion of my privacy and illegal!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]