[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: free vs. non-free debate

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: free vs. non-free debate
From: "Scot E. Wilcoxon" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 20:58:37 -0600
Old-return-path: <[email protected]>
Organization: self
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-date: 2 Nov 1999 02:59:09 -0000
Resent-from: [email protected]
Resent-message-id: <vld4nD.A.wzC.9NlH4@murphy>
Resent-sender: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

> We will refuse documentation covering non-free software.

I think free documentation covering Linux use of non-free software
should be as acceptable as free documentation covering Linux use of
GNU/Qt/Java/etc software.  Feel free to segregate the docs for non-free
software so people won't be confused between categories.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: free vs. non-free debate
  - From: Niels Kristian Bech Jensen <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: free vs. non-free debate
  - From: Alessandro Rubini <[email protected]>
- Re: free vs. non-free debate
  - From: Guylhem Aznar <[email protected]>
- Re: free vs. non-free debate
  - From: Mark Komarinski <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: free vs. non-free debate
Next by Date: Re: free vs. non-free debate
Previous by thread: Re: free vs. non-free debate
Next by thread: Re: free vs. non-free debate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread