[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: free vs. non-free debate

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: free vs. non-free debate
From: Tim <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 07:24:40 -0600 (CST)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-date: 2 Nov 1999 13:38:39 -0000
Resent-from: [email protected]
Resent-message-id: <x0_1h.A.vLE.eluH4@murphy>
Resent-sender: [email protected]

Hello,

> Yeah! And also refuse to cover non-free HARDware ;-)
Again, that's pretty much just muddying the waters, but this is in the end
the point.  The line will become so fine in the end that we will only
reduce the impact of the LDP.  *We* are here to offer assistance to the
rest of the community in the form of documentation, we cannot lose sight
of this.

Best Regards,
Tim Bynum



--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: free vs. non-free debate
  - From: Guylhem Aznar <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: free vs. non-free debate
  - From: Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: free vs. non-free debate
Next by Date: Re: free vs. non-free debate
Previous by thread: Re: free vs. non-free debate
Next by thread: Re: free vs. non-free debate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread