[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: working SGML package (was: free vs. non-free debate)

To: Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: working SGML package (was: free vs. non-free debate)
From: Gary Lawrence Murphy <[email protected]>
Date: 05 Nov 1999 14:05:58 -0500
Cc: "Scot E. Wilcoxon" <[email protected]>, [email protected], recipient list not shown: ;
Organization: TeleDynamics --- the Art of Being There
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: Gary Lawrence Murphy <[email protected]>
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-date: 5 Nov 1999 19:06:25 -0000
Resent-from: [email protected]
Resent-message-id: <UMD7zD.A.EKC.wqyI4@murphy>
Resent-sender: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

For what it is worth, I found the OpenJade package to be much easier
to manage; it is pretty much a drop-in replacement for the sgmltools
without the sgml2x scripts.

-- 
Gary Lawrence Murphy <[email protected]>: office voice/fax: 01 519 4222723
TCI - Business Innovations through Open Source : http://www.teledyn.com
Canadian Co-ordinators for Bynari International : http://ca.bynari.net/
Moderator, Linux Education Group: http://www.egroups.com/group/linux-ed


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

References:
- Re: working SGML package (was: free vs. non-free debate)
  - From: Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: working SGML package (was: free vs. non-free debate)
Next by Date: Re: working SGML package (was: free vs. non-free debate)
Previous by thread: Re: working SGML package (was: free vs. non-free debate)
Next by thread: Re: free vs. non-free debate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread