[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sgml-tools

To: Gerard Beekmans <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: sgml-tools
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 12:34:33 -0800
Cc: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Mail-followup-to: Gerard Beekmans <[email protected]>,[email protected]
References: <[email protected]>
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-date: 22 Dec 1999 20:34:24 -0000
Resent-from: [email protected]
Resent-message-id: <uhY28C.A.fPC.PXTY4@murphy>
Resent-sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mutt/1.0pre3i

On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 07:39:19PM -0500, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I know I've asked this question before and I think more people have
> asked this before. Compiling sgml-tools 1.0.9 is a disaster. Every
> single file gives a ton of warnings and won't compile. 

A few months ago I got 1.0.11 source from Brazil and compiled it on my
old 486 PC.  I think I got only one error message which I fixed in
several minutes.  Then it compiled fine and worked OK.  Since then
I've deleted it to save disk space.  I didn't need 1.0.11 as it seemed
to be little better than the pre-compiled Debain 1.0.9 that I have on
my Debian system.  However, perhaps an advantage of 1.0.11 (that I was
unaware of) is that it compiles easier.  I think Tim Bynum has a
tarball of 1.0.11 you might ask for.

			David Laywer

--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

References:
- sgml-tools
  - From: Gerard Beekmans <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: alternative sgmltools?
Next by Date: Re: alternative sgmltools?
Previous by thread: Re: sgml-tools
Next by thread: Re: sgml-tools
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread