[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ODE - requirement for Editors
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 01:01:29AM +0000, Martin Wheeler wrote:
> Guylhem Aznar wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 02:23:53PM +0000, Martin Wheeler wrote:
> >> Not only to correct the typos, orthographic errors, dubious grammar and
> >> semantic ambiguities any writer eventually becomes blind to, but -- far more
> >> essentially -- to ensure that coherent form and structure are maintained and
> >> understood by all members of a hugely disparate team, usually working in
> >> (almost) total isolation from one another.
> >
> > LDP 'Peer review' ensures this
>
> Great!
> How are the peer reviewers attributed/paired with their respective
> texts/authors? Is it a one-to-one ongoing arrangement; or a
> "take-it-as-it-comes" process?
Take as it comes. It is based on a volunteer group of reviewers with a
good technical knowledge.
--
Guylhem Aznar, Linux Documentation Project: http://www.linuxdoc.org
------>>> Attention, my new email is guylhem \@/ metalab.unc.edu
"They who can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]