[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Proposed LWN submission
- To: "Ldp-Discuss \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: Proposed LWN submission
- From: Gregory Leblanc <[email protected]>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:43:24 -0800
- Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
- Resent-date: 14 Feb 2000 18:43:32 -0000
- Resent-from: [email protected]
- Resent-message-id: <yZa4dC.A.CVE.TzEq4@murphy>
- Resent-sender: [email protected]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stein Gjoen [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2000 8:59 AM
> To: Gregory Leblanc
> Cc: Ldp-Discuss (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Proposed LWN submission
>
>
>
> > > > > and posting to <a href="news:comp.os.linux.announce";>cola</a>.
> > > >
> > > > I've been wondering what cola is!
> > >
> > > Interesting, in that case we cannot assume everyone else does
> > > so I will suggest it be spelled out in full.
> >
> > The problem with cola is that it's pretty darn ambiguous.
> > Comp.os.linux.announce, comp.os.linux.answers, there's
> probably another that
> > I'm forgetting. Those two are both talked about here, and
> cola doesn't tell
> > you which one...
>
> Since .answer has been used only for the Linux Journal FAQ the
Why? Well, nevermind now that I've read the announcement...
> cola acronym refers to comp.os.linux.announce but the ambiguity
> should be avoided and is fixed on the earlier posted alternative
> page
> http://reality.sgi.com/gferg/ldp/lwn.html
>
> It looks good enough to me and unless someone objects I suggest
> we mail it off to LWN as soon as we can agree on the announcement.
It still reads semiregular...
Greg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]