[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Problems with sgmltools 2.0.2 (+?)
Thanks for the quick response, both of you. I've been following the HOWTO-HOWTO
instructions, so I wasn't aware of the sgmltools-lite project; I'll give that a
shot instead.
I'm running a distribution that started almost a year and a half ago as
Mandrake 5.3, but has mutated rather fantastically since then. I've
successfully compiled OpenJade in the past couple of weeks (and then
uninstalled it, as something else wasn't falling in place)--so I'll try it
again, along with sgmltools-lite, and let you know how things go.
For those that are trying to follow in my footsteps, the pertinent URLs so
far are:
OpenJade: http://openjade.sourceforge.net
sgmltools-lite: http://sgmltools-lite.sourceforge.net
Thanks again,
Dan
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> I would strongly recomend that you get either a copy of Jade or OpenJade
> from the net. Cees tells me (and anybody else who asks) that the copy of
> Jade included with SGMLtools 2 doesn't work properly with the newer GCC.
> What distribution are you running? There may be binaries available that
> will run there so that you don't have to deal with getting this up and
> running.
> Grego
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Scott [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 12:04 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Problems with sgmltools 2.0.2 (+?)
> >
> >
> > Hi Hugo:
> >
> > I've tried getting the latest version of the sgmltools,
> > following Mark's
> > instructions in the HOWTO-HOWTO, and it looks like I'm
> > getting the source okay.
> > However, the sgmltools/VERSION file still contains the number
> > 2.0.2, so I'm not
> > 100% sure I'm getting the absolute latest version.
> >
> > Anyways, there are a couple of problems that I seem to be
> > stumbling into trying
> > to get the whole thing to compile:
> >
> > 1) I've read in the INSTALL instructions that gcc 2.8 may
> > fail to compile
> > sgmltools, and the recommendation was to use gcc 2.7. Ages
> > ago, I switched to
> > gcc 2.95.2; these days, even the kernel compiles with it
> > (heh). I'm not
> > relishing the thought of trying to set up my system to
> > include both versions of
> > gcc. Do you know whether the following warnings (one set;
> > there are other
> > similar warnings) result from using a recent version of gcc?
> >
> > In file included from ../include/CharsetInfo.h:11,
> > from CharsetInfo.cxx:8:
> > ../include/Vector.h: In instantiation of
> > `Vector<RangeMapRange<unsigned int,unsigned int> >':
> > ../include/RangeMap.h:27: instantiated from
> > `RangeMap<unsigned int,unsigned int>'
> > ../include/UnivCharsetDesc.h:73: instantiated from here
> > ../include/Vector.h:50: `Vector<RangeMapRange<unsigned
> > int,unsigned int> >::operator [](unsigned int)' has already
> > been declared in `Vector<RangeMapRange<unsigned int,unsigned int> >'
> > ../include/Vector.h:52: `Vector<RangeMapRange<unsigned
> > int,unsigned int> >::begin()' has already been declared in
> > `Vector<RangeMapRange<unsigned int,unsigned int> >'
> > ../include/Vector.h:54: `Vector<RangeMapRange<unsigned
> > int,unsigned int> >::back()' has already been declared in
> > `Vector<RangeMapRange<unsigned int,unsigned int> >'
> >
> > 2) Cees de Groot mentions in tools/makerpms.sh:
> >
> > # This walks through the packagelist, runs make for every package
> > # and finally calls my hacked version of 'rpm' which accepts a
> > # -bx switch (which does an install and then builds a binary package,
> > # a sort of short-circuiting that isn't allowed with plain rpm).
> >
> > Sure enough, my attempt to make sgmltools fails with the
> > following error:
> >
> > error 512 running RPM command
> > make: *** [.deps/build-jade] Error 1
> >
> > Since I don't know where to get Cees' hacked version of RPM
> > (and I'm not too
> > sure that I would want to have it installed on my system
> > anyways), would it be
> > possible to rewrite the makerpms.sh script so that it doesn't
> > use the hack? I
> > imagine this would make the package a little more usable, at
> > least for me.
> >
> > I really do like the goal of the sgmltools project, and hope
> > that it helps
> > sort out the difficulties that come up when we try to pull
> > together all of the
> > pieces necessary for Docbook. The interactions between the
> > tools can be pretty
> > complex, so we need something like the sgmltools project to
> > help the LDP in its
> > migration towards Docbook source.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dan
> >
> > On Tue, 09 May 2000, [email protected] wrote:
> > > On Tue, 9 May 2000, Roel van Meer wrote:
> > >
> > > > Can anyone give me a few hints on this? I have installed
> > sgmltools 2.0.2,
> > > > and I have read the Docbook HOWTO, but I don't feel like
> > diving in that
> > > > subject too deep. I think it just has to work. (I'm
> > playing with LDAP, not
> > > > with Docbook..)
> > >
> > > the sgmltool 2.0.2 are not working well. If you pick up the
> > latest CVS
> > > code things will go much smoother.
> > >
> > > And a Dutch description of how to setup a working
> > environment can be found
> > > on http://doc.nllgg.nl/ along with a RPM package made from
> > the CVS source.
> > > (also available as TAR ball. ;-)
> > >
> > > Hugo.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ Maasland
> > > [email protected] http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~hvdkooij/
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Quoting this tagline is illegal!
> (http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html)
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [email protected]
> --
> -----------------------
> Dan Scott,
> Friend of the abnormal.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [email protected]
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
--
-----------------------
Dan Scott,
Friend of the abnormal.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]