[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: experimental release of linuxdoc-tools (based on sgml-tools 1.0.9)
- To: "Greg Ferguson" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: experimental release of linuxdoc-tools (based on sgml-tools 1.0.9)
- From: [email protected] (Cees de Groot)
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 21:07:08 +0200
- Cc: Taketoshi Sano <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 17 May 2000 09:27:48 EDT." <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: [email protected]
- Resent-date: Wed, 17 May 2000 15:13:07 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-from: [email protected]
- Resent-message-id: <GqXcDC.A.8CF.J8uI5@murphy>
- Resent-sender: [email protected]
- Sender: [email protected]
[email protected] said:
> Do you think we should go that route? That way we have 1 toolset (jade/
> openjade), with support for both DTDs (DocBook and Linuxdoc).
It depends. Back then when we discussed SGMLtools v2, it was the general
feeling of people that the lifecycle of Linuxdoc was at its end and people
should start moving towards DocBook. To that end, we wrote SGMLtools v2 and
provided a conversion script. Starting now with a completely new piece of
software to support Linuxdoc, for which adequate conversion support is still
supplied by the current toolset, would not exactly give off that signal.
Really, the LDP needs to regard the Linuxdoc DTD as legacy stuff. It's a big
effort to get all the LDP authors to agree on submitting new versions of
especially their HowTo's in DocBook, but I think it's worth it (better tools,
more developer attention - FreeBSD, KDE, etcetera).
--
Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com <[email protected]>
http://sgmltools-lite.sourceforge.net/
GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD 1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B
Forge your CipherSaber and list it: http://www.xs4all.nl/~cg/ciphersaber/
PGP signature