[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
From: Richard Stallman <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 16:23:39 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007211508070.28547-100000@crazypenguins.commandprompt.com>(message from Poet/Joshua Drake on Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:09:20 -0700(PDT))
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007211508070.28547-100000@crazypenguins.commandprompt.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Resent-date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 18:23:03 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-from: [email protected]
Resent-message-id: <GpOOQC.A.LsG.17he5@murphy>
Resent-sender: [email protected]

    I agree with not including Option A. But option B, is harmless (at least
    IMHO) it allows complete distribution electronically, and you can print it
    all you want as long as it is not for profit.

That limitation is exactly the problem--if something is limited to
"not for profit" then it is non-free.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
  - From: Poet/Joshua Drake <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
  - From: Poet/Joshua Drake <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Novell/NDS HOW-TO
Next by Date: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
Previous by thread: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
Next by thread: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread