[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
From: Richard Stallman <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 16:25:39 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007210919370.23138-100000@crazypenguins.commandprompt.com>(message from Poet/Joshua Drake on Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:42:27 -0700(PDT))
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007210919370.23138-100000@crazypenguins.commandprompt.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Resent-date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 18:24:57 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-from: [email protected]
Resent-message-id: <Qx-r4C.A.ARH.n9he5@murphy>
Resent-sender: [email protected]

The OpenContent license as I last checked it did not qualify as a free
license, so I hope you won't include it in your list.  (If you think
it has changed and I should recheck it, please let me know.)

The Open Publication license does qualify as a free license *if* the
options A and B are *not* used.  Please ask people to refrain from
using these options if they use the Open Publication license.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
  - From: Poet/Joshua Drake <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
  - From: Poet/Joshua Drake <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
Next by Date: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
Previous by thread: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
Next by thread: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread