[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: date formats

To: David Lloyd <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: date formats
From: Martin WHEELER <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:13:56 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Resent-date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:40:31 -0500 (EST)
Resent-from: [email protected]
Resent-message-id: <RIYJdC.A.JZH.9kjN6@murphy>
Resent-sender: [email protected]

On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, David Lloyd wrote:

> The date saga is silly. Would someone just say that XYZ is THE standard
> for the LDP and be done with...I vote for the internation ISO standard.

Seconded.

Now ... for this week's inter-cultural flame-fest -- what other
standards does the LDP need to look at and get properly sorted?
(Bibliographic references, for example.  Which system are we supposed
to use?) 

msw
-- 
Martin Wheeler       -        StarTEXT - Glastonbury - BA6 9PH - England
[1] [email protected]                   http://www.startext.co.uk/

--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: date formats
  - From: David Lloyd <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: date formats
  - From: David Lloyd <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Cyrillic HOWTO: raised from the dead (unmaintained)
Next by Date: buscando...
Previous by thread: Re: date formats
Next by thread: Re: date formats
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread